Open-Ended Results Detail
 
    Displaying 1 - 82 of 82  
14. If you have any comments about the overcrowding situation (e.g. incentives to encourage school transfer, guiding principles the School Committee should use when making decisions), please share them here. Comments about the survey are also welcome:
1. I would like to know more regarding the reason for the increasing enrollment at Cabot. For example, regeneration -- younger families moving to the community -- that's one thing (positive), approving single family homes for multiple unit convresion or apartments is another. (what is the impact) Are there any reasons for the increase that we should look at and address at the same time? Also, if we were to have border zoning, it should be done with consideration for families with siblings already in paricular schools to keep families together.
2. Thanks for taking the time and effort - very much appreciated.
3. I think we need to have a cut-off on the number of children who can enroll to avoid a chaotic and potentially unsafe situation. New families would not be guaranteed enrollment in their neighborhood school because of overcrowding. Give them a choice of two or three other schools, offer smaller classes, provide transportation and reassure families that their children will be able to attend a quality after school program. I would not be adverse to larger class sizes if their were a teaching assistant or team teachng. I do not think the arts should be given short shrift because for some children, this may be the only area in which they can excel. We need to honor and provide for artistic intelligence. Adding trailers is preferable for the short-term, but may not be feasible economically. No one mentioned lobbying the state for more money for education. Massachusetts is near the bottom in terms of money spent on public education (hopefully that will change with the new leadership!). I have been looking into Stand for Children's enegy effeciency campaign which proposes that the schools should undergo an energy audit. From that audit, substantial amounts of money can be saved by inplementing energy saving solutions, e.g. using more energy efficient light bulbs.
4. The most important thing is continuity for students already at Cabot School. Taking them away, or splitting up siblings, is bad strategy. A modular classroom is the best solution to keep kids together. Modular classrooms worked befrore, and became permanent, which demostrates their longevity.
5. Vouchers for students that opt out of an overcrowded school.
6. My vote is for modulars.
7. I believe every effort should be made to keep the current students at Cabot. Modulars should be used to accommodate the existing students. The school committee should be given the authority to use "border zones" to assign new students to 1 of 2 schools only when overcrowding occurs (based on a pre-set definition of overcrowding, e.g. * 20 students per K classroom)and only if the "displaced families" are given the option to return to the other school the following year. Also, although we have lived in our Newton home for nearly 10 years, I don't think that families that have lived here longer should receive preferential treatment. I think this will cause animosity in our community and could potentially depress property values. Finally, Cabot renovation plans must be kept on schedule. My kindergartener rushes home everyday to use our home bathroom because she will not use the K bathroom because of its condition! (As a side note, she has no qualms using other public restrooms.)
8. First of all, I don't think Cabot should allow any transfers ins from other districts. Obviously, there is no easy solution, but I think moving an entire grade would be the best, keeping those kids together.
9. The survey requires you to answer every question. Some of the questions did not have any options that expressed my opinions, making the survey somewhat biased (as you HAD to answer even if you did not agree with any of the options.) That being said, I think it would be extremely detrimental to separate ANY grade level from the school for any period of time. It will fracture the community of the school, a community we have worked hard to keep strong and involved. I would prefer a modular classroom addition to Cabot School over ANY of the other options outlined in this survey. If the modular is not a possibility, then It seems like the most obvious solution is changing the borders within the city to help enrollment "even out" at all the elementary schools across the city. None of the other options seem educationally sound to me, with the LEAST desirable choice being moving a grade or some classes out of Cabot for a year.
10. Excellent survey, educational for me! I hope my opinions help. My family is new to Cabot and we would feel less welcome in the neighborhood and community if we were told we couldn't go to our neighborhood elementary school because we were NEW to the neighborhood. I believe new should not be the criteria for excluding a student. How would that effect house sales or interest in moving to a neighborhood in Newton. Would your realtor like to tell prospective buyer, "oh by the way, you can't go to the local school, you'll get bussed to....." Thanks.
11. n/a
12. If there is an option in place to request transfers to other schools due to overcrowding, then families should be made aware of the classsize numbers and space issues at other local elementary schools. Perhaps a website could be established quickly providing that information. Also, it is important for people to know where the "border" areas are so that they can be prepared for all possibilities. I may be in a border area but don't know it. Bottom line is decisions may be made on information that is not readily available to families and that's going to create problems and many hard feelings. Open communication and availability of the important details is critical and needs to be addressed now. Moving the kindergarten or 5th grade are the only sensible options for moving whole grades. It is not reasonable to move a mid grade for a year and then "hopefully" bring them back. That will make drop off and pick up for families with kids in different schools too burdensome and unfair.
13. I think re-districting is the fairest policy, grandfathering in kids who have siblings already at Cabot.
14. If any class schould be moved it should be the K class. K's can attend different schools and the begin at Cabot in 1st grade. Many parents already send their Children to different K's and begin at Cabot in the 1st grade. This would free up 4 rooms...then maybe add a modular and things could be better.
15. if increasing class size is a viable option (is there room for more desks and kids in each class??) then increase the number of teachers (perhaps have some floating teachers, assistants, student teachers) in order to foster more or at least consistent amount of individual attention. Also, if any class should "move" it should be the oldest (5th) as they would be leaving next anyhow. Can a modular type classroom be put up somewhere to accomodate the entire 5th grade?
16. Short term should be a short term solution. Some years are overcrowding and some might be less. There is a range of capacity to a neighborhood- so, in a way, the city should know the max. of childrens that can live in a neighborhood. So split siblings is not an option. I also think, it's important to children to play after school time, with the same kids that attend with them to class, running into them at the street, at the playground and etc. Art and music giving the kids apportonitty to express themself in a less formal way which is very important to their development. It's is much more important then to maintain small class size.
17. This survey was very well done. I think it is a no brainer to assign students in border zones to less crowded schools and to encourage voluntary transfers by willing parents to less crowded schools.
18. Thank you for the opportunity to provide input. My first choice is a 2 floor modular at Cabot thus keeping all current kids and teachers together and welcoming new kids into Cabot. My second choice is to move the incoming Kindergarten to another school since the Kindergarten is already quite separate from the rest of the school adn parents are used to having their kids in different places if the kindergartener is a sibling. thank you!
19. I have not been very generous with my willingness to compromise - but given that I leive three blocks away from the school - makes my willingess to bus my children elsewhere unacceptable. IF anything - I thinkt he City of Newton MUST limit the teardown of single family home and replacement of multi-family in this neighborhood - at least put a moratorium on this type of conversions until the space crunch is addressed.
20. The survey is a great idea! We're newcomers to the neighborhood, but not to Newton. The Cabot School is the main reason we chose the particular house we bought. We would be absolutely devastated should our children not be able to attend Cabot after we worked so hard to get there. The Cabot community has a reputation for being warm, welcoming, inclusive, and high energy. May it remain so and find a way to get those modular classrooms so that no child in the neighborhood is forced to leave Cabot.
21. Thank you for asking for my opinion. The most important thing is to keep the community together. I vote for modular units and if this does not work, music and art on a cart. I want all grades to be at Cabot. Every child who lives in the district should be able to attend Cabot.
22. How this could affect after school options. As we did not get many days/hours this year, I may be interested in moving to a school that had access to after school program access. However, if we moved temporarily, would we lose our "status" in CASP? It's hard to say without knowing which school our child would move TO! We would like to know which way they are leaning - the sooner the better so we can look into alternative options (like private school or moving out of Newton!)
23. Not sure what the next question means. Do you mean OTHER children who aren't already attending?
24. All address in Newton should be in multiple School districts ie Cabot/Underwood/Ward etc. not just border zones. All new students should potentially have to attend not there first choice school. Both parents and the school dept should have some say as to were new students will be placed. Proximity and sibling attendance should have a high priority. Newton must use available space before other more costly solutions are arrived at.
25. Has the city looked into the possibility of "taking back" former school buildings now that we NEED them?
26. Incentives to encourage school transfers: *offer free busing, especially to students who are bused to/from school already. if you can catch them before they enroll in an overcrowded school and direct them to a nearby, less crowded school then they shouldn't mind as much. *inform people about after school options available at other schools (extracurricular classes, after care programs) that are not available at overcrowded schools. guiding principles: * don't waste time and money on more short term solutions, please look at long term solutions. e.g., instead of spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on modulars, put that money into actually upgrading the schools that need it. * look into how so many other towns have managed to build beautiful new elementary schools recently. friends in weymouth, hudson, clinton, etc. have children attending state of the art new elementary schools while ours are overcrowded and run down -- how is that possible?!?
27. temporary structure while building permanent larger building and upgrade to existing building. shift kinder to different school for 1 yr. while building goes on with large permanent double decker modular is built. also implement border zone as a permanent help to cabot to keep numbers down. do long term view of future real estate development for incoming numbers. new developments have "adult only" condos to keep numbers down.
28. If I could afford a house in a school district that had lower enrollment (ie Ward) I would move. Entering students with no older siblings should be assigned to another school.
29. I bought my home ~3 years ago so that my daughter could attend school in Newton, specifically Cabot. The ideas presented to defer and re-route children, eliminate art and music, are completely off base. Two of the most important reasons people come to Newton is for the quality of the schools and sense of community - you are disrupting more than the classrooms when you break up schools, eliminate programs, or turn children away, you strike at the very heart of what makes Newton a wonderful place to live. Our ONLY option is to MAKE MORE ROOM available, cutting corners won't cut it. The modular classrooms and expedited renovation appear to be the only viable options on the table; otherwise, you are opening up a huge can of worms.
30. You should be able to alter your survey answers if you have second thoughts.
31. It seems to me that The school committee look very closely at a permanent solution which would mean redistricting the neighborhoods. I think any incoming/new students should be reassigned to less crowded schools near by and not every child should be able to attend their immediate neighborhood school. I also think Cabot needs to keep planning renovations because it really needs to be fixed. I think it would make sense to have students attend Underwood or Horace/Mann depending on numbers. I also think if students are reassigned that there be enough teachers in those schools to accomodate the number of students going there. I don't think that families that have more than one student in a school should have to send children to two or more different schools but this may have to happen in order to help the situation. This is a complex issue which I think the School committee needs to be more proactive and figure out sooner rather than later.
32. It is hard to understand how we could take anyone out of district from anywhere at this point.
33. I think that in addition to managing the short term crisis, the School Board needs have a long term focus. I believe that the school Board should focus on rehabbing the Carr School and redistricting the whole City so that there is excess capacity at all the elementary schools. A short term solution, whatever it is, will be much more palatable if it is presented with a long term plan to ensure the short term plan is truly an interim solution.
34. There has not been widely advertised information about the possibility of school transfers. While we would not entertain that option because our children are deeply entrenched into Cabot, it gives families choices. It seems a reasonable first step to determine whether folks voluntarily would be willing to shift because it fits their family needs. BTW, I am deeply opposed to limiting METCO as a way to resolve overcrowding. We need a greater mix of children in our schools. It is a critical part of everyone's education.
35. I believe it is very important to keep siblings together.
36, Perhaps having a staggered schedule where the younger children (K - 3) go to school earlier and the older children (4 - 5) begin later in the morning, that could potentially reduce the demand for maximum use.
37. This was a well-constructed survey. Thanks for taking the time to do it! I would like to emphasize that for me, proabably the most important thing is to allow students who have started at Cabot to continue there with their current cohort. Of course, there are those who will voluntarily decide to leave, but I don't think this should be mandated. Ideally, I would like to see class sizes remain where they are now, but I would prefer a slight increase in class size to mandated redistricting. I alsao think the option of having one entire grade move offsite would be ok, and I think it makes the most sense for this to be the kindergarten as that schedule is somewhat different anyway. but t
38. We'd rather see a plan that impacts more people slightly than fewer people severely. Maintaining the ability to walk to school for those in range is also important. (We do it daily regardless of weather.) Keeping costs under control is, of course, desirable, but minimizing cost to the town seems excessive.
39. I think the only feasible options are modulars (for the short-term) and renovation (for the long-term). Other solutions (apart from border redistricting, citywide) would simply be too disruptive and unfair to students.
40. The integrity and quality of Cabot -- or any elementary school -- is deeply connected to its ability to evolve into a caring community of children and adults, including students, parents, teachers, specialists, and administrators. This is the foundation for everything else that happens at the school, academically, socially, and healthwise. I believe that the top priority in decision making should be related to ability to keep the Cabot Elementary School community intact. For example, moving classes of students and teachers from each grade level to another location would fragment and fracture the community. I think this is a completely unacceptable and harmful solution. I feel the same way about forcibly moving all border zone students to other schools since it would force current students out of the Cabot community. Bringing in some modular units while keeping long term planning in progress would be the least fracturing of our community. A mid-level compromise might be to move the kindergarten grade level to another location. While not ideal, and understandably difficult to younger siblings of current students, this would keep the current student population intact and allow for the incoming first grade children to join the Cabot community, just within a different timeline. Again this would not be my first choice, but as mid-level compromises go, the least harmful, I believe. One comment about the survey. Many of the questions contained too many variables so that I was concerned about my answers truly reflecting the meaning that I wanted to convey. Otherwise, you did a fantastic job, and I appreciate the hard work of the volunteers who put this together. Thank you very much.
41. The optimal decision depends critically on how long the over crowding will last. How good are your estimates? Relocating a class to another school should only be considered if it is a one to two year problem. If the over crowding last longer then modulars are optimal. If overcrowding lasts more than 5 years, the permanent structures are optimal.
42. As I commented at the 10/25 session, the School Committee and the Superintendent need to institute a better capacity planning process, including improved projection techniques and allowing for spare classroom space. Managing by crisis is not managing at all.
43. Consider not ading new MEDCO students till overcrowding is solved.
44. We just purchased a home in the Cabot district and our children attend Cabot school. We would be very disappointed if our children were involuntarily reassigned to a different school, since Cabot was the appeal for us to move to the neighborhood (and pay a premium price for our house!). If there is a decision to redraw borders, it should not affect current students, and people considering the sale or purchase of a home in the district need plenty of advance warning.
45. I think the current conditions at Cabot are already adversely impacting learning and disrupting the community seems like a very difficult solution. Although expensive, I think a modular would be the best temporary fix as it keeps our community intact.
46. Thank you very much for all your efforts!!
47. I believe that building modular classrooms does not remedy the problem of overcrowding in other areas of the school such as gym, auditorium, assembly and library space. Regarding the last question (#13), I want it to be known that I believe an entire class should be moved to a less crowded location so keeping siblings together in that respect would not be desirable to me. I do believe that siblings should not have to go to a different school during their entire elementary experience. Also, I do not have a preference which class gets removed from Cabot school. I chose Kindergarten because on the surface it seems the least disruptive. Families can choose to keep their Kindergartners in a pre-school/Kindergarten class or move them to Cabot. However, it may be nice for the 5th grade to have their own space to put on plays and other older activities. I'm not sure what the options are so it's hard to determine what activities can happen at a separate location.
48. centralized all K students. Bus them to a specific school where K students from Newton meet.
49. If I was told my child had to leave her current school, I might refuse it. What then?
50. Communities such as Brookline have "buffer zones" which are geographically located equi-distant between two schools. All families moving into these zones know that their child will be assigned to one of these schools based on enrollment patterns. These zones tend to have children who go to both schools, so no new child is left isolated as the only one going to a different school. Children who live one block from the local school are not assigned to another school much further away as these zones are truly between two schools. Flexibility is built into this system as census patterns change over time. I hope we can get modular classrooms to help with short term planning, and introduce this buffer zone system to address both short and long term planning issues. Thanks for doing this survey!
51. I was unclear about the wording in the following question: I would assign entering students to schools randomly in the event of overcrowding. Are ENTERING children just NEW children? If so, I strongly agree. I believe strongly that a modular is without a doubt the best SHORT TERM option as long as Cabot would stay on the same track for it's upgrades. Thanks.
52. Keep class size small at all cost!!!!!!!
53. I would not object to children from the same neighborhood being assigned to different elementary schools, provided the assignments were random or at least based on something OTHER THAN "seniority" or length of time having lived in the area. Newton is insular enough without making it still harder for newcomers to be integrated into their communities.
54. I would recommend maintaining geographically contiguous neighborhood zones for the schools; it was an important part of the school experience for us to be able to have our kids walk to school, and for the three of them to be able to attend the same school. I understand people think Cabot is a great school and have may moved here to be able to send their kids there. However it won't be such a great school any more if Art and Music are relegated to itinerant "visits" and class sizes exceed 25. Therefore the most sensible alternative would seem to be to redistrict border areas to neighboring schools. None of this will affect us, since we are moving on next year - maybe that makes us unbiased? However we do live very close to Cabot and would probably have been unaffected by the plan I'm recommending, so maybe some bias is showing through anyway. I would say this: if we had been redistricted somewhere else I would have been furious given our proximity to Cabot. Then again I'm sure other people will have other reasons for being unhappy about whatever plan you settle on - best of luck and thanks for soliciting our opinions.
55. As a new parent and the product of a large urban school system (Baltimore), I don't have strong ties to Cabot itself (yet). But I do believe very strongly in a local school where the community has a strong voice (and that Cabot seems to have!). I personally spent a year in an "off-site" location, due to overcrowding, at a former monastary and the hardest part was not interacting with friends in the same year as me. If classes need to go off-site, I'd advocate keeping those in the same year togeather.
56. Thank you for the Survey; it is really good. Our family can only imagine a solution, where the goal is to keep the Cabot Community (teachers, students, parents, siblings) together and all other issues (renovation, extra class room) are less important. We do not think that it is a good idea to make harm in the Families (especially in children!), to distroy a nice community - based on "space problems". There is a saying in our country: "Many good people can live in small space." We believe in this, as well as in the Cabot Community.
57. Please put information about buffer zones and option to choose schools on the website where it can easily be accessed so parents going forward have this information.
58. If a class/grade moves to a different school, why not make them part of the community of the new school. It seems to me that the underlying assumption is that they would still be part of the Cabot community. But may be it be nicer/easier to make them part of the other school's community.
59. I'd like to mention and expand on one comment from the school committee meeting relating to zoning residences for three possible elementary schools. (a long-term space crunch consideration) Couldn't families who have children entering Kindergarten under this type of zoning select 1-3 their order of preference and then be assigned an elementary school based on a set of clearly defined criteria. Criteria could include a) where siblings currently attend, b) length of time the family has lived in Newton, c) class size. Short-term I feel it is very important to keep students where they are presently unless individual families volunteer to attend a different school. I feel strongly that the City of Newton must and can find the means necessary to fund the construction of modulars at Cabot for a short-term solution to space crunch issues there.
60. I am a strong advocate of public education. I am proud to be part of the Cabot community. I am extrememly pleased with the quality of education at Cabot. However, I'm quite dismayed at the state of the buildings/facility and the lack of classrooms across Newton. My husband keeps advocating pulling our children out of public school and into private schools everytime the facilities issue or class size is brought up. I want to make Public schooling work in Newton and I'm upset this situation has been aloowed to go on so long..
61. We need better methods of forecasting. Just by looking around Cabot district these last few of years, at 2-family conversion to condos, amount of construction, # of home sales, etc and factoring in home prices and impact on residents (1/2 of 2-family or townhouse has become de facto new "entry level Newton housing") it was eminently foreseeable that Cabot would become overcrowded. Why wasn't action taken previously? e.g. redistricting for new families in border zones (grandfathering of current students) or other?
62. Inform NEW families with pre and school aged children of the overcrowding issues and let them know what other schools they could send their children to are and help with teh process. Give students already enrolled at Cabot and with younger siblings the option to switch schools but DONOT force them to redistrict. I think all siblings should be kept together at the same school unless the parent(s) feel two different schools would benefit their children and family.
63. Along with many school related issues, I see this as an equity issue. If one school can maintain small class size, have gym, auditorium, art and music rooms and others can't, then those schools should be expected to give up space or have increased class size so Cabot, Zervas, etc. can enjoy the same distribution of resources. Newton residents who were "unlucky" enough to move to crowded districts are still paying the same taxes and deserve access to the same level of quality in education.
64. Keep in mind that the decision to split up the Cabot students entering 6th grade between Day and Bigelow has had a negative, and perhaps unexpected, impact on many students and families. For me, this experience highlights the critical importance of keeping the members of a community together and therefore would support, and should be considered when making, any decision to keep siblings and tenured families at Cabot and to place new students at alternative locations.
65. very good survey. i feel that i was given a good oppty to express my views by the questions asked. great use of surveying.
66. I think the first choice should be a modular. If we can't get that, I think we should move an entire grade, either the incoming Ks who have no experience in the school, or the 4th or 3rd graders who are established but are not in their final year. In the long run, the school committee should create "flexible districts" for entering families but should keep kids and families at schools once they are there. No individual child should bear the burden; move a whole grade at a time. Small class size should be maintained, and any movement should be accompanied by free busing.
67. I've heard of other families making requests for other schools to which they live closer (namely, Peirce School). These requests are always rejected. It seems that requests to other good schools such as Mason Rice, would be denied as well. If they are all crowded, I'm not sure the idea of border areas is worth the effort. However, immediate improvements in zoning must be made. Single families houses cannot be torn down and replaced with townhouses. It's created a density which the infrastructure was not built to suuport. Existing multifamilies can stay but the rest of the city must be converted to SR1 if we are to preserve the schools without building a new one.
68. Am disappointed in the lack of leadership by our principal on this issue. She has done a poor job of communicating anything other than her annoyance at parents for raising this issue. Stongly value siblings being kept together Needs of curriculum and class size should take precedent over any consideration given to CASP. Do not believe census at school justified recent ban of parents from the school building at the start of school.
69. I think solutions that minimize impact on individual families are desirable. For example, a family with two or more elementary age children shouldn't have to send them to more than one school. A family with one elementary age child would more appropriately be asked to send that child to a less crowded school.
70. When taking a survey, one always wonders what the outcome is. I'd like to know and I'd like to know any analysis of the survey is. thank you for taking the time to put together the survey
71. The space chart that the town put together does not include how much storage space each school has. Does every school have A/V equipment, copy machines, and other supplies in the corridors like Cabot does? Has the fire chief been through each of the school buildings and approved the way stuff is stored in the hallways, which are also the means of egress in the event of a fire? I would recommend that the school district central office have a larger role in the enrollment of new students. When we moved into the area, we should have been told that Cabot was a bit crowded and we should have been given one or two choices of other local schools that were not suffering the same space constraints. What does the state building code (or Mass School Building Authority) say about the number of square feet required per student. Some schools have larger classrooms than others. The number of students assigned to a particular room should be based on what the room can safely accomodate. This is usually disctated by the State Building Code or the State Education Department. The fire inspector is then the one who enforces the building code/state education department policy by approving/rating a room for a maximum number of occupants.
72. What about MEDCO students? Why are we still accepting them if our school is overcrowded? What about adding enough aides and assistant teachers to help with the larger classrooms? Where's regular communication on rennovation plans/timing?
73. The modular classroom is the obvious solution. Let's see some leadership for once and have the school committee get the modulars in place for next year.
74. If redistricting is involved, I would like the issue of Cabot being split between 2 middle schools addressed. I would prefer that we all attend 1 middle school. This is a very clear and well constructed survey.
75. I think the idea of moving an entire grade to another space is an excellent short-term solution (the only reasonable one in my opinion). Of course, the most logical grade to move would be the kindergarteners since they have not yet started at Cabot. I think it would be much more difficult on children to be moved in the upper grades. The truth is, the least integrated into the fabric of the school are the kindergarteners. So one more year in another place would not be at all detrimental to them. Then in first grade, they can become full members of the Cabot community and remain there through 5th grade. One might make the argument to take the 5th grade out but I think that is a terrible idea. They long look forward to being the oldest kids in the building and have a right to be able to have one last year of innocence before they head off to the large and socially challenging world of middle school.
76. Modular classrooms would be (by far) the best alternative. Many people puchase their homes based on elem. school districts. For example, my wife and I bought our home because we can walk to Cabot with the kids and Cabot has an after-school program. Changing schools would be a real problem.
77. I am curious if anyone has asked why so few kids are enrolling in the Ward School? Is there a problem or a reason why so many new people moving to the area choose not to go to that district or to enroll there? It seems that it would be worth looking into this pattern of high enrolment in neighboring districts yet low numbers in the Ward.
78. Optional Zones may even be appealing to new K & 1 families, as well as those in the current school who wish to move to get a "fresh start". I cannot stress enough the negative impact cohort redistricting could cause, especially if only a subset of a grade is forced to move. Cabot School students are already impacted enough by being split up for Middle Schools. To do this two times to them is short-sighted. The emotional and academic impact is likely to be significant.
79. Regarding moving classes or an entire grade to another school, my first thought was that if you move the entire grade, then you guarantee that some families will have children in two different schools. But then I wondered if there's any way to realistically avoid that. It would be very interesting to see a list by grade of how many students have no siblings in other grades. I suspect the highest numbers would be for oldest children entering kindergarten and youngest children finishing 5th grade. So maybe the answer is to move one kindergarten class and one fourth or fifth grade class. Of course, there's no good solution.
80. Survey was comprehensive and hit on all the points. After decisions have been made to alleviate overcrowding, it might be useful to understand how Newton got into this situation in the first place. What can we do proactively to avoid these painful decisions in the future?
81. The burden should be borne by all, not just new kids, not just kids who have siblings. If a family has kids in two different schools, it will be very burdensome to attend all the events, teacher meetings... FAmilies should stay together if they want.
82. I would not use some of the beginning questions in the survey. They did not seems totally sensical to me. I think you should really rely on question 12 to gauge the community's views.